Lost in Localization: How Name Changes Erase and Vandalize Cultural Identity

The examples showcased on the website usually merely scratch the surface of the extensive alterations made to the original script or visual design. 
Think of them as just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to illustrating the breadth of changes implemented.

Introduction

Localization has become a Trojan horse for cultural erasure, masquerading as accessibility while gutting the soul of original works. Nowhere is this betrayal more blatant than in the systematic renaming of characters, places, and concepts—acts of arrogance that overwrite creators’ intent with foreign sensibilities. These changes are not mere translations; they are acts of cultural vandalism, stripping names of their heritage, symbolism, and narrative purpose to cater to imagined Western preferences. 

Xenoblade Chronicles 2 stands as a damning case study. Shinto deities reduced to generic fantasy tropes, historical figures erased into forgettable aliases. From the seven deadly sins scrubbed of moral weight to blades like Musubi (bond) rebranded as Vess, the game’s localization exemplifies how name changes fracture identities, obscure themes, and sever ties to cultural context. This essay dissects the rot at the core of such practices, exposing how the arrogance of localization perpetuates colonialist norms, reducing art to a palatable lie for audiences deemed incapable of engaging with the unfamiliar.

The localization of Xenoblade Chronicles 2 is not merely a translation—it is a systematic erasure of Japanese cultural, historical, and thematic intent and Biblical symbolism. By altering nearly every name in the game, localizers replaced the creators’ meticulously chosen terms with Westernized substitutes, stripping the narrative of its depth, symbolism, and authenticity. Below, we dissect the damage wrought by these changes, using the provided list of localized names to demonstrate why such alterations are indefensible.


Cultural and Historical References Erased

The game’s original script is steeped in Japanese mythology, history, and linguistic artistry. Localizers, however, treated these names as disposable:

  • Blades as Mythological Anchors:
  • Kagutsuchi (カグツチ), the Shinto god of fire, was renamed Brighid—a Celtic figure with no connection to the game’s themes.
  • Byakko (ビャッコ), the White Tiger of Chinese/Japanese myth, became Dromarch, a meaningless Western-sounding label.
  • Suzaku (スザク), the Vermilion Bird symbolizing the south and summer, was rebranded Roc, a generic European mythological bird.

These changes sever ties to the game’s core inspirations. Kagutsuchi’s role as a fire deity is central to Xenoblade 2’s lore of elemental Titans, yet his name—and thus his cultural weight—was discarded. Similarly, Byakko’s association with the Guardians of Heaven (四神) is erased, reducing a symbol of cosmic balance to Dromarch—a name loosely inspired by Welsh linguistics but stripped of its original mythological weight.

  • Historical and Folklore Figures:
  • Yoshitsune (ヨシツネ), the legendary samurai, became Akhos—a nonsensical alteration that robs the character of his roots in Japanese warrior tales.
  • Benkei (ベンケイ), the storied warrior-monk, was renamed Patroka, stripping away his historical resonance and reducing him to a generic antagonist.

These changes reflect a disdain for Japanese cultural heritage. Renaming Yoshitsune and Benkei is akin to rebranding King Arthur as “Knight McSword” in a Western game localized for Japan.


Thematic Coherence Destroyed

The original names are not arbitrary—they are narrative keystones. Localizers dismantled these connections:

  • Nations as Symbols of Sin:
    The game’s nations were originally named after the seven deadly sins in Latin, tying the story to a moral framework:
  • Avaritia (Greed) became Argentum—a meaningless shift from sin to silver.
  • Superbia (Pride) became Mor Ardain—a clumsy attempt to sound “medieval European.”
  • Invidia (Envy)—part of the original seven deadly sins motif—was renamed Uraya, a term derived from the Japanese urayamashii (羨ましい, “envious”). This change epitomizes the localization’s incoherence: while erasing nearly all Japanese references elsewhere, here it injects a Japanese term into a Latin framework, fracturing the game’s thematic unity. The result is a baffling contradiction: a setting stripped of its original sin-based moral architecture, yet haphazardly repurposing Japanese language in ways the creators never intended.

This erasure of the sin motif undermines the game’s exploration of human flaws and redemption. The original terms (Gula for Gluttony, Luxuria for Lust) grounded Alrest’s conflicts in universal moral struggles, which the localized names trivialize.

  • Religious and Spiritual References:
  • Ten no Seihai (天の聖杯, “Heaven’s Holy Grail”) was stripped of its title, reducing Homura/Pyra’s sacred role to a generic “Aegis.”
  • Rakuen (楽園, “Paradise”/Eden) became Elysium, swapping Judeo-Christian symbolism for a Greco-Roman afterlife divorced from the story’s themes.

These changes reflect a broader pattern of censoring religious subtext. The Holy Grail’s absence severs ties to Arthurian and Christian lore, while “Elysium” confuses the game’s stakes—Alrest’s quest for Eden is a biblical metaphor, not a Greek myth.


Linguistic Play and Subtext Lost

Numerous of Japanese wordplay and cultural references were gutted, some of them:

  • Musubi’s Dual Meaning:
    The blade Musubi (ムスビ), localized as Vess, carries profound significance. Musubi means “bond” or “connection,” referencing both the onigiri and the spiritual ties between characters. A sub-quest centered on musubi—a term chosen deliberately by the creators for its dual meaning as both an onigiri and a bond—serves as further proof of their intentional use of Japanese language and symbolism to deepen narrative cohesion. Renaming it “Vess” erases this layered metaphor, reducing a cultural touchstone to a meaningless label.
  • Hana’s Growth and Humanity:
    The original Hana (花, “flower”) evolves through forms like JS (女子小学生, joshi shougakusei), JK (女子高生, joshi kousei), and JD (女子大学生, joshi daigakusei), symbolizing her growth from an elementary school student to a college student. This progression mirrors human development, emphasizing her journey from innocence to maturity (which reflects in her appearance). Localizers renamed her Poppi and reduced her classifications to QT and QTπ, degrading Tora’s intent to craft an artificial blade that mirrors human —and its poignant metaphor of growth—into a meme-worthy quirk, erasing the affectionate nod to Japanese societal milestones in favor of superficial humor.
  • Blushy-Crushy:
    The term moe (もえ), central to Japanese fandom culture, was translated as blushy-crushy—a cringe-worthy phrase that infantilizes the concept.

These changes reveal localizers’ refusal to trust audiences with cultural specificity. The result is a narrative stripped of wit, warmth, and depth.


The Hypocrisy of “Global” Settings

Some people argue that “Alrest isn’t Japan,” so Japanese names feel incongruent. This logic is flawed: Eiyuu Densetsu (The Legend of Heroes), a series with overtly Western-inspired settings, features characters like Rean Schwarzer and Alisa Reinford—names deliberately chosen by Japanese creators to fit the world’s aesthetic. If Xenoblade 2’s developers wanted Western-sounding names, they would have followed this approach. Instead, they rooted their world in Japanese tradition, naming blades like Homura and Hikari to reflect their cultural and symbolic essence. Renaming them Pyra and Mythra is not “localization”—it is cultural vandalism.

Creators have the right to name characters as they choose, regardless of the fictional world’s “geography.” Xenoblade 2’s blades are characters with personalities. Renaming Homura to Pyra is no different than localizing a Japanese legend about Emperor Jimmu—the mythical founder of Japan—and renaming him King Arthur to “appeal” to British audiences. And Vice Versa.


The Double Standard of Localization

The localization’s arbitrariness exposes cultural bias:

  • Sigurd (シグルド) remains Sigurd, preserving Norse mythology.
  • Kamui (カムイ), an Ainu term for divine beings, becomes Obrona—a Polish word for “defense.”

Why are Western myths preserved while Japanese ones are “translated”? The answer is clear: localizers deem Japanese culture “too foreign” but Western references “universal.” This is cultural imperialism, not localization.


Symbolic Patterns Erased: The Power of Three

The game’s structure revolves around the number 3, a motif with biblical and cultural resonance:

  • Three Blades in Combat
  • Three Attack Phases: Combat mechanics mirror this tripartite structure, reinforcing themes of balance and synergy.
  • The trio of Homura, Hikari, and Pneuma represents a trinity—a direct nod to Christian symbolism of unity in three forms.

These are obviously not the only places where the symbolism of the number 3 is used.

Localizers retained the name Pneuma for the third form but stripped it of its contextual ties to the game’s trinity motif, fragmenting the symbolism of the number 3—a core biblical and philosophical pillar. By disconnecting the term from its original framework of divine unity and moral reckoning, the spiritual weight of the triad is diluted, weakening the narrative’s foundation.


Respect the Art, Not Your Ego

Localizers who alter names operate under the arrogant belief that their interpretation supersedes the creators’ vision. Homura is not a “word”— it is HER a name, chosen by Japanese writers to evoke flame’s beauty and destructiveness. Hikari is not “just light”—it is her name, a deliberate anchor in Japanese linguistic tradition, symbolizing hope. Renaming her Mythra erases not only her cultural roots but her very identity, reducing a title steeped in meaning to a sterile Westernized word for light.

The provided list of changes is a map of vandalism:

  • Laura (ラウラ) to Lora
  • Wadatsumi (ワダツミ), a sea deity, to Aegaeon
  • Musubi (ムスビ) to Vess

Each alteration is a fracture in the game’s soul. To those who argue, “Localizers know better,” remember: Xenoblade Chronicles 2 is a Japanese game. Its names are Japanese. Its soul is Japanese. Deal with it—or stop consuming media of a culture you clearly despise.

Localization should bridge cultures, not bulldoze them. The flames of Homura and the light of Hikari deserve better than to be snuffed out.

Why “Meaningful” Names Are Not Meant to Be Translated

In Japanese storytelling, it is a cornerstone tradition for characters to bear names that harmonize with their traits, roles, or symbolism. Kasumi (霞, “mist”) might veil her past in mystery; Chihiro (千尋, “great depth”) could embody resilience; Makoto (誠, “honesty”) personifies integrity. These names are not accidents—they are narrative devices, layers of meaning woven into the fabric of the story. Yet, if we applied the logic of Xenoblade 2’s localization, these characters would be stripped of their identities and reduced to laughable literalism:

  • KasumiMist
  • ChihiroGreat Depth
  • Renji (連辞, “copula”) → Linking Verb
  • Hiro (寛, “tolerance”) → Fathom
  • Mizuki (水木, “water tree”) → Dogwood
  • Kaori (香, “aroma”) → Scent
  • Shiori (栞, “bookmark”) → Page Holder
  • Mai (舞, “dance”) → Twirl

The absurdity is self-evident. Japanese names, by design, carry inherent meanings—Haru (春, “spring”), Akira (明, “bright”), Yuki (雪, “snow”)—but translating them would annihilate their cultural and emotional resonance. By this logic, every Japanese name in media should be “localized,” rendering casts into absurdist parodies: Sasuke (佐助, “helper”) becomes Aid, Naruto (鳴門, “roaring gate”) becomes Whirlpool. Yet no one demands this, because audiences understand that names are not puzzles to solve—they are artistic choices.

Xenoblade 2’s localization commits this very sin. Homura (“flame”) and Hikari (“light”) are not exceptions—they are part of a universal tradition. Renaming them Pyra and Mythra is no different than rebranding Luke Skywalker to Light Plains-Walker in a Japanese dub of Star Wars. The setting’s “global” aesthetic is irrelevant; names are sovereign. To alter them is to amputate the soul of the work, leaving audiences with a hollow shell—disconnected from the artistry they love, and insulted by the assumption that they cannot comprehend nuance.

Conclusion:

The argument that a fictional setting justifies altering names is a cowardly deflection—one that ignores the fundamental truth: names are not disposable labels. They are vessels of cultural identity, narrative intent, and authorial vision. Whether a story unfolds in a fantastical Japan, a mythic Europe, or an original universe like Alrest, the creators’ choice to name a character.

For audiences who choose the original Japanese voices, this betrayal cuts deeper. Hearing Homura spoken aloud while reading Pyra in subtitles creates a jarring dissonance, fracturing immersion and severing the emotional tether between player and character. It reduces the experience to a clumsy compromise, forcing fans to reconcile two conflicting realities: the art they love, and the butchered proxy shoved into its place.

Localizers who defend such changes claim to serve “accessibility,” but their true legacy is alienation. They alienate creators, whose vision is mutilated. They alienate audiences, who are handed a disfigured shell of the original. And they alienate culture itself, reduced to a commodity to be stripped, packaged, and sold as “global.”

There is no excuse. Not “setting,” not “tone,” not the arrogant assumption that audiences cannot handle foreign syllables. Xenoblade Chronicles 2 is a Japanese game. Its names are Japanese. Its soul is Japanese. To alter them is to deny its creators’ humanity—and ours. The flames of Homura burn brightest in their native tongue. Let them.

As a supplement, we also recommend reading the following post too:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Check Also